they care about who is running a positive or negative campaingn. who has charisma... etc.
one barack supporter said :
"I don't expect Obama to run an anti-McCain TV ad campaign any more explicitly than he's run an anti-Clinton TV ad campaign. Unless he falls into a desperate situation running against McCain, I think he'll stick with the positive, inspiring thing, maybe run some anti-McCain stuff on the radio and let outside groups like MoveOn do the bulk of the attack ads. That's fine with me."
right... and therefore obama is not negative because he has his surrogates and the media do it for him? and some how being anti-clinton is consistant with being positive and inspiring. what the f*ck. they are full of boloney.
why can't they focus on the issues? oh right, because their candidate is just a novice and has to take advice from everyone. he is just a good marketing tool for the group of unattractive advisers he has behind him.
hmm. who does that sound like... george w. bush! and let's remember what happened over the last 7yrs. his group of advisers went on delivering some hidden agenda far removed from what was promised during his campaign. remember "compassionate conservatism" and "bipartisanship"? not so different than "hope" and "change" no?
is obama positive and inspiring if he does not inspire positive campaigning?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment